Ibn Sı̄nā on patterns of proofs
نویسنده
چکیده
This section 9.3 of Ibn Sı̄nā’s Qiyās is a commentary on sections 25 and 26 of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics i, pages 41b36–43a19. NB the parallel passage in Ibn Sı̄nā’s Burhān iii.2, p. 136ff (Badawi). The paper below is what Wikipedia would call a stub. I will add and correct as time allows. I make the paper available now because it contains a complete translation of Qiyās section 9.3, which is a prerequisite for Ibn Sı̄nā’s section 9.6 on proof search, whose translation is already on this website. The relevant material is about the relationships between two kinds of compound syllogism, which Ibn Sı̄nā refers to as ‘connected’ and ‘separated’ compound syllogisms. The section contains historically interesting material on inductively defined classes and methods for proving their properties. The paper will discuss this material when I can get a better hold on what ideas in this area were already available in Ibn Sı̄nā’s time. I would be grateful for any leads on this. (An obvious place to look is the linguistic tradition starting with the Kitāb al-cayn.) The section also contains an unusually large amount of low-grade material; some of it looks like preliminary notes by students. Sifting out this material will be a major editorial chore. For this reason among others, the translation below is highly provisional. But I am hugely grateful to Amirouche Moktefi who went through the translation with me and made many improvements; we did this sitting in a cafe some forty miles from Aristotle’s birthplace.
منابع مشابه
Ibn Sı̄nā on analysis: 1. Proof search. Or: Abstract State Machines as a tool for history of logic
State Machines as a tool for
متن کاملIbn Sı̄nā and conflict in logic
During the 1020s Ibn Sı̄nā wrote a commentary in Arabic on the logical works of Aristotle, as part of his encyclopedia Al-Šifā’ (The Cure). The commentary runs to some 2180 pages in the recent Cairo edition; this figure includes his commentary Madk ̄ al on Porphyry’s Eisagōgē, which he counted as an introduction to Aristotle’s work. Apart from the Madk ̄ al which was translated into Latin in the 1...
متن کاملAffirmative and negative in Ibn Sı̄nā
Aristotle in his Categories 10, 13a37ff, De Interpretatione 4f, 17a8–37; 10, 19b5– 20b12 and Prior Analytics i.2, 25a1–13; i.46, 51b5–52b35 introduced a distinction between affirmative and negative (kataphátikos and apophátikos, or in noun form katáphasis and apóphasis). Aristotle’s views are not my concern here. But already Aristotle’s treatment of the notions raises some fundamental questions:
متن کاملThe grammar of meanings in Ibn Sı̄nā and Frege
I thank Manuela Giolfo, Ahmad Hasnaoui, Amirouche Moktefi, Zia Movahed and Kees Versteegh for information, corrections and comments that relate directly to things discussed below. I should also thank Kais Dukes of the Arabic Language Computing group at Leeds University, who sent me some very useful information before going silent — I hope I didn’t make myself a nuisance to him. None of these pe...
متن کاملفهرست اسماء مؤلفی الشیعه
This article is an attempt to have an analytical study of the book of Ahmad Ibn Ali Ibn Abbas Najashi, one of the Shiite experts in the science of the transmission of hadith. Considering certain proofs and evidence it shows that The List of Names of the Shiite Authors was presented to the world of knowledge at that time not at the time of the life of its author, but rather many years after his ...
متن کامل